tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2368367183212372939.post3946255417720147724..comments2008-11-25T13:53:48.235-06:00Marcy Hoen, Stylisthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06405685576948594779noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2368367183212372939.post-66595787501964000802008-11-25T13:53:00.000-06:002008-11-25T13:53:00.000-06:00Thanks for your comment, Aaron! Art historians DO need to embrace the economics of art. As the old saying goes: Bankers get together in the evening to talk about art, and artists get together in the evening to talk about money"<BR/>Thanks for visiting!<BR/>MarcyAustin Art Starthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06405685576948594779noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2368367183212372939.post-43109570718266088282008-10-31T15:41:00.000-06:002008-10-31T15:41:00.000-06:00Nice Interview. I can see why people have difficulty applying economics to art history. Although, David's not only right, but also super bold when he says there's no intellectual curiosity when it comes to art history. <BR/><BR/>Come on art historians! Step up and debate. Don't just turn your back on David's theories.AaronMSBhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04703482608143041294noreply@blogger.com